Categories
Recent Entries
- Biffle wins, but focus remains on Busch, Johnson
- What does the first race of the Chase really mean?
- Our first look at the Nationwide’s new car
- Handicapping the Chase: Week 1
- Keeping one eye on Hanna, the other on NASCAR
- Franchitti heading back to IRL
- In a quarter of a lap, Busch shows why he’s the championship favorite
- What to expect from California’s fall race next season
- What does the future hold for Logano?
- Do we need to ask if Busch is still immature? Didn’t think so
Monthly Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Syndicate
A good Chase? Or just competitive?
Brian Hunsicker
Oct 24, 2006
As I’ve said for a long time — though I can’t take credit for coming up with it — there’s a big difference between a good game and a competitive game.
Using football as an example: Team A beats Team B by a single point on a dramatic final drive. That, however, concludes an error-filled game, rife with penalties, turnovers and other mistakes. Does that make it a good game? Of course not.
So is this year’s Chase for the Cup good? Or just competitive?
Page 1 of 1 pages
|
|
To make the Chase good, I’d expect a handful of drivers, say the top five, to have distinguished themselves six races into the Chase. Instead, at least three of the top five spots have changed hands each race since New Hampshire, the first Chase race.